Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kevin Kim vs Rik De Voest Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kim vs Voest analysis and find out who is favored!
Kevin Kim vs Rik De Voest Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kim 0 - 0 Voest
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kim has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Voest has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kim, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Voest has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kim has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Voest has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kim has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Voest winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kim has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 88/ 60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 17/ 23). Voest has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kim has played against opponents with an average rank of while Voest has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kim has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Voest has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kim has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Voest has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
45
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
44
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Kevin Kim vs Rik De Voest For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Kim VS Voest
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kevin Kim | Rik De Voest |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Kevin Kim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Kevin Kim
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
40%
(
18 of
45)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
48%
(
23 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nils Langer
Player
Kevin Kim
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
52%
(
50 of
97)
15
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
101
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kevin Kim
Player
Sebastian Bader
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
60)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marcelo Arevalo
Player
Kevin Kim
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kevin Kim
Player
Eduardo Dischinger
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
43%
(
27 of
63)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Drew B. Lied
Player
Kevin Kim
30%
(
3 of
10)
1st Serve %
100%
(
6 of
6)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
2 of
3)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
9
Total Points Won
7
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kevin Kim
Player
Peter Tarwid
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
9
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Robert Farah
Player
Kevin Kim
63%
(
65 of
103)
1st Serve %
51%
(
55 of
108)
18
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Fernando Carvajal Torres
Player
Kevin Kim
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve %
50%
(
11 of
22)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
11 of
19)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
13 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
27
Total Points Won
25
|
3-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Wayne Odesnik
Player
Kevin Kim
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
21 of
37)
11
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
16 of
21)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Rik De Voest Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Rik de Voest
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
115)
9
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
1
81%
(
51 of
63)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
31 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rik de Voest
Player
Jason Jung
61%
(
70 of
114)
1st Serve %
66%
(
76 of
116)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
52 of
76)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
42 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
116)
115
Total Points Won
115
|
4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| SF | 7-5 4-2 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Luke Saville
Player
Rik de Voest
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rik de Voest
Player
Karol Beck
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
50 of
98)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
10
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Rik de Voest
Player
Mao-Xin Gong
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rik de Voest
Player
Min-Hyoek Cho
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
41%
(
45 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Kim Vs Voest Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Kim are available here and Voest photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
